ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare our institutional experience using durable left ventricular assist devices (dLVADs) as a bridge to transplant before and after the 2018 heart allocation policy change. Methods: Since the allocation change, 29 patients have been bridged to heart transplantation with an isolated dLVAD at our institution. We matched these patients with the most recent 29 consecutive patients bridged to heart transplantation with isolated dLVAD. Baseline pretransplant characteristics and comorbidities were compared between cohorts. Incidence of posttransplant complications, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were compared, as well as 90-day mortality. Results: Annual number of recipients bridged to transplant using a dLVAD declined after the first year following the allocation policy change (Figure A). Median age, body mass index, and distributions of primary heart failure etiology and dLVAD usage were similar between cohorts. The new policy cohort had a higher incidence of female recipients (21% vs 3%;P=0.044), but a lower incidence of patients maintained on intravenous inotropic therapy at time of transplant (3% vs 21%;P=0.044). Rates of prolonged mechanical ventilation, re-intubation, stroke and renal failure were comparable between cohorts. Intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay were also similar. At 90 days, the new policy cohort experienced higher mortality (21% vs 3%;P=0.044) (Figure B). Conclusion: From our institutional experience, there appears to be continual decline in patients bridged with dLVAD following the allocation policy change. While rates of many postoperative complications appear comparable to the prior era, short-term mortality appears to be higher. Changes in the heart transplant allocation system have resulted in changes in donor availability and selection for recipients with durable LVADs. These changes, along with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, may be responsible for these observations.